It may well be that Michael Jackson was, at the end of the day, asexual. Asexuality is a rare topic to hear about; on some levels, it elicits even more of a "what's wrong with you?" reaction than homosexuality or bisexuality. It can be a difficult and embarrassing thing to try to explain; little wonder that few try. Kinsey and others have estimated that about 1% of the population is essentially asexual - not to be confused with being celibate, which is a choice. Asexuality is an orientation, one which few openly claim for themselves. (I learned in the process of making this post that Edward Gorey was asexual. I hope he acknowledged this with no sense of shame.)
There's a reason, you know, that so many celebrities came to Michael's defense over the years and so few disavowed him outright. Maybe money's involved. Or maybe Michael really was that rare creature whose closet was not that he had kinky predilections or a minority orientation but that he had no orientation at all. Our society remains so afraid of sexuality that we can’t even talk about the absence thereof as a concept. American society would truly benefit itself by getting over a few hang-ups and having some honest national (and local) conversations about sex and sexuality.
"In the Closet" wasn't one of Michael's better records. As happened increasingly through the '90s, he got lost in his own mix, burying his quavering words beneath overproduced New Jack beats and effects. It's one of many cases where he forgot the joy that could be found in singing a simple song and sought with his producers to craft a many-handed epic instead. And it's so abstract that it fails to be erotic. But it grooved enough to hit #1 R&B and make the pop Top 10 in 1992 as Dangerous's third single, and it's worth revisiting for a moment this week to see, yet again, how the conflicts and contradictions in Michael Jackson's life unfolded in his songs, sometimes despite himself.
Farewell, Michael. We hardly knew ye.

